[Fresh Ink] Dirtier tar sands Coming

[Richard Menec]

http://oilsandstruth.org/dirtier-tar-sands-coming

Dirtier tar sands Coming

By SHAWN BELL, SRJ Reporter 17.FEB.09

The Alberta government has tried sneaking through a policy allowing the 
oilsands to get even dirtier, according to the Pembina Institute, an Alberta 
environmental think-tank.

The new policy allows in-situ oilsands operations to burn bitumen, petroleum 
coke or asphaltenes instead of natural gas to produce steam, processes that 
increase air emissions by 40 to 66 per cent. The policy was posted to the 
Alberta Environment website on Dec. 23, 2008, with a deadline for public 
feedback set for Feb. 13, 2009.

Pembina only noticed the policy on the day of the consultation deadline.

"The reason we're dealing with this so late is that nobody knew anything 
about it," said Simon Dyer, director of Pembina's oilsands program. "It was 
posted in the middle of the Christmas lull, with no press release. They want 
to push it through right away, so by March oilsands could be burning bitumen 
and petroleum coke."

Bitumen is much more carbon-intensive than burning natural gas. Petroleum 
coke and asphaltenes are waste products of oilsands upgraders.

Compared to conventional oil production, in-situ oilsands production 
produces four times the greenhouse gas pollution per barrel when burning 
relatively cleaner natural gas. According to the Pembina Institute's 
analysis, in-situ oilsands operations burning petroleum coke would produce 
66 per cent more greenhouse gas pollution than if the same operation were to 
burn natural gas. "While Canada seeks to assure the U.S. that efforts are 
underway to clean up dirty oil from the oilsands, Alberta is unveiling a 
policy that takes us in exactly the opposite direction," Dyer said. The 
policy includes a requirement that in-situ plants be designed to be capable 
of capturing carbon emissions in the future. "Steam generators, when using 
non-gaseous fuels are required to be carbon dioxide capture-ready," it 
states.

Dyer scoffed at the wording of the policy.

"Carbon capture-ready is essentially a meaningless statement," he said. "It 
means that industry must have the space available to install capture carbon 
technology at some point in the future. But Alberta and Canada have no 
regulations or reduction requirements that would require carbon capture and 
storage (CSS), nor has CCS been proven for application with in-situ oilsands 
operations."

"It's ironic that while Alberta puts out a plan to make oilsands development 
more environmentally friendly, they're pushing a policy that will increase 
greenhouse gas emissions," he added.

original URL:
http://www.srj.ca/default.asp?sourceid=&smenu=88&twindow=Default&mad=No&sdetail=3429&wpage=1&skeyword=&sidate=&ccat=&ccatm=&restate=&restatus=&reoption=&retype=&repmin=&repmax=&rebed=&rebath=&subname=&pform=&sc=1957&hn=srj&he=.ca

==============
Fresh Ink is an alternative news service
and sister project of Booksinternationale.com.
Join us! http://booksinternationale.info/mailman/listinfo/freshink
==============