[Fresh Ink] Civilian Death Toll Soaring In Afghanistan
Richard Menec
menecraj at shaw.ca
Mon Aug 3 20:49:53 CDT 2009
http://www.countercurrents.org/cogan030809.htm
Civilian Death Toll Soaring In Afghanistan
By James Cogan
03 August, 2009 WSWS.org
A report issued late last month by the Human Rights Unit of the United
Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan (UNAMA) sheds light on the rising
number of innocent Afghan men, women and children who are being killed in
order for the US and its allies to consolidate their neo-colonial occupation
of the country.
The UNAMA report contrasted the number of officially recorded civilian
deaths for the first six months of 2009 with the number in previous years.
>From January 1 to June 30, it registered 1,013 civilian fatalities,
"compared with 818 for the same period in 2008, and 684 in 2007". In other
words, as the Obama administration has escalated the war and sent thousands
of additional troops and aircraft to Afghanistan, the number of civilian
deaths has soared by 24 percent.
The military activities of both the Taliban-led insurgency, dubbed in the
report "Anti Government Elements (AGEs), and the operations of the so-called
Pro Government Forces (PGFs)-foreign troops and Afghan government security
forces-contributed to the body count.
Insurgent roadside bombings and suicide bombings were blamed for 595 deaths
or 59 percent of the casualties. In many cases, civilians were killed during
attacks on occupation military targets. American and NATO forces drive
convoys through residential areas and have established bases inside Afghan
towns and villages in order to prevent them coming under the direct control
of the Taliban.
Included in the number of civilian deaths caused by the insurgency are also
a number of pro-occupation government officials and employees who were
assassinated.
The occupation forces killed 310 of the civilian deaths recorded by UNAMA,
or 30.5 percent. "Unknown" or unconfirmed parties were held responsible for
the remaining 108 fatalities, or 10.5 percent.
Air strikes were the main cause of fatalities inflicted by the US and allied
forces. UNAMA recorded 40 air attacks that, combined, caused 200 deaths. In
June alone, six air strikes killed 51 people, suggesting that the rate is
climbing despite proclamations by American generals that greater care is
being taken to avoid what the military still calls "collateral damage".
UNAMA's assessment of the impact of air strikes would be challenged by many
in Afghanistan. The report accepted, for example, the official figure that
63 civilians died in the hours-long May 4 aerial assault on the village of
Bala Baluk, in the western province of Farah. Locals continue to insist that
the number who died was at least 144. It also accepted that the hundreds of
alleged Taliban killed in remote areas of the country by air strikes were in
fact combatants.
According to a tally compiled by Associated Press, American and NATO forces
claimed to have killed more than 2,310 Taliban this year. In 2008, the tally
was over 3,800. With the scale of fighting escalating, the new commander in
Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, ordered occupation forces in
mid-June to stop giving any estimates on alleged Taliban casualties.
The air strike figure also does not count the hundreds of men, women and
children who have been killed this year by missile strikes launched from
unmanned US Predator drones over the border in the tribal agencies of
Pakistan. The anti-occupation insurgency is supported by the ethnic Pashtun
population of the region. In retaliation, the US military is waging a
systematic campaign of killings and terror against them.
On June 23, a single US attack on a funeral procession in South Waziristan
killed over 80 people. In just two days in July, Predator strikes killed
another 80.
Other civilian deaths that may not have been counted, or been falsely
reported as Taliban fatalities, are those inflicted during the regular raids
conducted by special forces' units on the homes of suspected insurgent
leaders, fighters or financiers.
The report noted: "Implementation of search and seizure operations
(including night time raids) are also of concern, and there have been
reports of a number of joint Afghan and international military forces
operations in which excessive use of force has allegedly resulted in
civilian deaths." Agencies such as UNAMA rarely have the ability to
independently verify who, and how many, are killed in such actions.
Overall, the UNAMA report makes a pessimistic estimate of the situation
facing the US-led occupation in Afghanistan. Far from Obama's surge curbing
Afghan resistance to the presence of foreign troops, the Taliban and other
insurgents are gaining support and expanding the territory in which they
operate.
UNAMA noted: "As the conflict has widened and deepened throughout 2007, 2008
and into 2009, almost a third of the country is now directly affected by
insurgent activities with differing intensity. Armed conflict is
particularly prevalent in the South, South-East, East, Central, and Western
regions of the country. It is also spreading into areas formerly relatively
tranquil, such as the North and North-East."
The occupation forces, in response, are "attempting to quell the insurgency
and responding to insurgent activity within civilian areas, [and] are also
conducting more operations in areas where civilians reside. These factors
have resulted in a rising toll in terms of civilian deaths and injuries and
destruction of infrastructure, including homes and assets, which are
essential for survival and the maintenance of livelihoods."
The result will be greater numbers of Afghan civilians losing their lives,
particularly in the continuing air strikes against alleged Taliban targets.
On July 30, the Los Angeles Times reported that McChrystal had instructed
that the Predator drones previously used for hunting for Al Qaeda leaders in
remote mountainous areas of the country be focused instead on operations in
"major insurgent strongholds"-i.e., areas with large civilian populations.
McChrystal has also requested that at least another dozen of the unmanned
aircraft be dispatched from the US to Afghanistan. Central Command has
further ordered the redeployment of U2 spy aircraft, combat engineer units,
road-clearance teams and helicopters from Iraq to the burgeoning war in
Afghanistan.
Underscoring again the fraudulent character of the "war against terrorism",
an unnamed official told the Los Angeles Times: "We might still be too
focused on Bin Laden. We should probably reassess our priorities."
McChrystal himself declared in a recent interview: "I don't think there is
enough focus on counter-insurgency. I am not in a position to criticise
counter-terrorism, but at this point in the war, in Afghanistan, it is most
important to focus on almost classic counter-insurgency."
Far from being against terrorism, the war is against the Afghan people. The
consequence of the rising death toll among both civilians and insurgents
will be wider hostility toward the occupation forces and greater sympathy
for the armed resistance to their presence.
At the same time, the surge is leading to a rise in US and NATO casualties.
In July, foreign occupation forces in Afghanistan suffered their worst
casualties of nearly eight years of war, with 75 losing their lives. In just
the first two days of August, nine US and NATO troops have been killed-a
rate as high as the worst days of fighting in Iraq.
The UNAMA report predicted that a sharp upsurge in violence would take place
over the next several weeks, as the Obama administration and its allies
attempted to hold a stage-managed presidential election in the
country-including in areas controlled by the Taliban, where Afghan President
Hamid Karzai is viewed with contempt.
More information about the FreshInk
mailing list